COSMIC TRANSLATION CLASS 9 - recent arrivals - a few uniphysics foundations - mars global catastrophe Impressions about Mars, as seen in mono photos using virtual 3d everyone can use even seeing themselves in a mono photo in full authentic 3d. Daffy duck finds the brain Daffy duck epiphanates backwards Daffy duck checks the left hemisphere Daffy duck investigates the other lobes Daffy duck declares 3D in mono is nonesence Daffy duck goes ahead, gets another Phd without stereo in it RECENT ARRIVALS AT THE MARS GLOBAL CATASTROPHE THEORY HOME FRONT ANOTHER PATHFINDER ON MARS PHOTO NON-STEREO, RELEASED MID AUGUST 1997 The little robot has done a lot of twists and turns, its tread tracks are everywhere. The 6 inch robot's tracks give you an approximate of scale - these large rocks are merely your ordinary garden backyard variety in size. What are the chances it is still stuck up sideways on a rock. There seems to have been a complete media blackout since the end of July. Either those mysterious rocks mentioned for several days yielded civilization signs, or a martian came and wet polished the lens, or a political signal came rocketing down from places on high from Mars for instance), or the MEDIA just got tired of the stuck on rock hourly news flashes and quit, leaving us all scratching our heads. Here musters a closer look at those rectangular rock formations (straight line rectangular grid). It is hard to say what this is, even with the high resolution of the muster. Were they there before Rover landed. Rover's tracks can be seen within the grid but only in one tiny part of it. The quess would be that Rover scraped it up into grid formation. Well, that's what it is all right, an entire Rover dug out you can even see the spoil spots in gouges in persective only inches high. It looks like Rover went as far the shadow of the big rock and came back, then in turning around pushed up what now looks like a straight line thin wall, but its not. This is not mountainous Mars terrain it is the piece in your back yard that hasn't yet been sodded with lawn. We are talking inches here as the hight of Rover's tell tale back and forward stop gouges. FROM OUT OF NOWHERE THIS ON THE INTERNET, A ROCKY FORMATION ON MARS THAT HAS MORE THAN LICHENS AND MOSS V e r r y mysterious kind of ox cart spoke pattern for rocks that are supposed to be chisled by random geophysical processes. Progressive enhancements reveals nothing new about the spokes. Maximum enhancement reveals no secrets hid in the outcropping rocks. The slope on the next hand is another matter, a number of small items catch the eye. Since that which catches my eye may be different than that which catches yours, here are the images without comments. MOUNT OLYMPUS THE LARGEST VOLCANO SO FAR KNOWN IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM Satellite scans taken at two different times of the day, note the sunshine. The incident angles of the sunlight account for the optical illusion (the innies are outies and visa versa). Wait for it, the illusion can change abruptly to proper inspective. A SURPRISINGLY GIGANTIC MOUNTAIN RIDGE THOUSANDS OF KLICKS HIGH TAKEN AT A RESOLUTION OF 30 FEET BY SATELLITE DEAR PERSON How would you like to see your picture in stereo. It is this one ...gif from internet site.... Even though mono, it is a stereo picture. This I discovered by chance in 1996, I think the discovery that any mono picture or image contains genuine 3D content is one of the simple boons of the century. Physicists and sciences have denied any stereo 3D can exist in an image without a binnocular stereo pair but this is wrong, you only have to know how to best bring out a mono picture's stereo to see it, as witness your own image in 3D with me doing nothing except presenting it onscreen correctly with acquired know-how as to exactly how to get the best 3d quickly. Notice how your mono picture of yourself is actually two identical images presented side by side on the screen, a slight compaction of width of one, a slight expansion of height of the other no more than .02% of realsize, and the height all increased by about 10 points and stereo is obvious when the two side by side images are focused together by eyesight. CAUTION A word of caution to potential stereo-izers, a bit of booze can temporarily cost you your stereo vision. Three cans of beer can cause you to start double-vision focusing or give you inability to draw two images together in either cross-eyed focus or drift focus. A half bottle of wine will knock you off line for an hour or two. Please, if you are going to view any images in stereo, do them sober, and if not sober, reserve all judgement until your ability to focus properly has been restored. Merge any two same at side images together in overlay, the resulting overlay optics has sharply increased small details by positive re-enforcement, plus, deep space topology aspects not seen in mono 2D images, become abundantly clear Perhaps previous track record suffices as to how an individual outside of academica can come across such a find. My name is Greydon Moore, a former associate of Bill Philips of CHQM circ. the latter 60's. Recordings by me were for awhile being played on CHQM, CJOH, and other top stations featuring futuristic poetries and prophetic inclines. My lattest seige is at the keyboard putting together by myself what is now the largest privately administered astronomy site in the world, with 1000's of images and over 200 subject studies, most all of it original in new discoveries or interpretations as to what the astronomy images really contain and are really revealing to us, most all outside of professional astronomy current planes of regressive peer fear limitations and chronic uncertainties about budget monies and grants, with many very hard sincere workers doing their best to try and work through a professional realm rife with pitfalls and short circuits. (http://www.visitastronomy.com) Daffy duck finds the brain Daffy duck epiphanates backwards Daffy duck checks the left hemisphere Daffy duck investigates the other lobes Daffy duck declares 3D in mono is nonesence Daffy duck goes ahead, gets another Phd without stereo in it Having trouble focusing in stereo by eyesight, cannot drift focus, going cross eyed is uncomfortable, method number three makes virtual 3D possible also. Method Number 3 - use TWO giant magnifying glasses held side by side close to the screen, a 3rd Virtual image will form in between. Move in an out slowly to focus. The image (tho enlarged) WILL BE STEREO. BINNOCULAR stereo - eyeballs move - simply go cross-eyed the two images leap together at once. DRIFT stereo - eye focal length - let the eyes drift until an easy feature on the two images combines. MAGNIFY stereo - virtual overfocus - overfocus a magnifying glass into double images a long way out until a new blurry third image forms in between, then slowly refocus in or out until sharp. If using a pair of sherlock holms sized magnifying glasses, the stereo image will form in an up oval window between round blurred images on either side. MAGNIFY is good for a quick look at a detail. DRIFT is good to see the whole view in a stable way. BINNOCULAR is by far the best to see true stereoscopic image. except it fights if there are small near (close by) details, for instance stars very near by in space, will stand well forward even out of the screen, but are very hard to focus with a dominant image present in the farther reaches of outer space. ANNOUNCEMENT I have made available something very important about stereo. Any single (mono) photo has genuine stereo in it. Proof is in the real image of Raoul the Houseboy, and the below image of the Subaru Telescope. Both are genuinely stereoscopic and both are each in single (mono) photos. How is this possible. Picture a photo of the Moon, when turned upside down the crators turn into buttons (the innies turn into outies). How does this happen. Take care. Once you start to think about it the answer is not the pat long standing answer that it 'is an optical llusion' Raoul the Houseboy is here: (http://www.visitastronomy.com/seeme.htm) Optical indwelt holographic properties in optical illusions are here: (http://www.visitastronomy.com/3d-optic.htm) QUICK REVIEW OF OPTICAL INDWELT HOLOGRAPHIC PROPERTIES.... A camera in a space shuttle passing over the Moon from north to south, takes a single mono single photo of the Moon, facing south. The crator in front of them the astronaughts see is a 'crator', because it is being seen in 'binoccular stereo' (seen with both eyes in 3D). The same astronaughts heading North and facing the same crator in front of them (to the north) see the same crator in 3D, because also, of binoccular vision. Now, make the astronaughts snapshot a picture facing south from the north, of the crator, and it will be correct when later viewed with the photo lying on a coffee table. Have the astronaughts take a picture of the same crator again, facing north from the south, and again they will see the crator as a crator, when the photo lays on a coffee table. But, turn either photo upside down, and the crator in either photo will instantly transform from an innie to an outie. How is this possible. The answer is complex, not simple. First, in nature of the two photographs, the 3 dimensional topology of the crator on the Moon has been physically transformed into 2 dimensional (flat) photographs, the third dimensional seeming clipped away. A second change is that when the astronaughts up there are viewing the crator from either direction (north or south) in low orbit, the image they see is constantly being refreshed by incident light rays striking the crator from all angles, and stiking their eyes (entering their pupils) also from all angles, all angles and all light rays carrying information about the crator, which is constantly being changed in real time, even as constant illumination sources strike the crator at fixed long distance locations. That is, the image coming into the pupils is fluid in time. But, on the instant of the snapshot of the photo all that is coming into the camera (a single pupil of an eye) is, at one instant, locked in time. Now, this is not a perfect lock, since, during the part of a second (seconds) in which the image is being shot, some real-time information is flooding into the camera, in other words a flux of incoming photon-informants comes into the camera from all angles, after striking and reflecting off the crator at all angles. In other words the image captured on film has multiple personality content. In a sense, a very real, very suble, hologram has just been stored on film, the hologram containing all that is the 3 dimensional (stereo) content about that crator. This means that rays of light from the upper left corner of the crator strike the lower right corner of the film, and visa versa, the image being created in the camera is not rays travelling strictly point source to point source, as binnocular stereo theory upholds as the only way for an image to be stored in a camera. Due to the fact that the image is data locked, (only a brief flux from the image has been registered in the camera's film), the exact angle at which the image was shot becomes critical. When the image is later turned upside down, incident light reflections and refractions from the crator do not match with the incident light which was illuminating the crator and also streaming into the camera pupil from all angles. This miss-match (when the image is turned upside down) accounts from the apparent 'optical illusion', where the crator's image turns from an innie into an outie. In other words, the mono photo is basically assymetric in two venues, the angles from the crator to the film, and angles from illuminating source striking the crator and incidentally (from the light source) also entering the camera. When the resulting photo is turned upsidedown, these two angle sources become out of phase rather than in phase. The out of phase view is incorrect, the crator has turned from an innie into an outie, the out of phase also qualities in angles at which illuminating sources strike the flat now in hand doing optical illusions. Just having these above insights in mind, is enough to give cause to understand that STEREO in a MONO photo EXISTS and is real. The above 'crator insights' provide grounds for assuming physics which can handle genuine STEREO in a MONO photo. I personally do not have the boxes in the lobes which can generate and handle fundamental physics equations which spell out the phenomena(s) at length, as would have, say, Issac Newton have spelled out at length in equations such phenomena had he come across it. I wish I had the lobes but do not. Instead, I cop out with a plea associated with Scottish Researcher Micheal Farady who did not have the lobes to spell out complex equations and mathematics, but wrote out his ideas well enough and clearly enough that others were able to read, understand, duplicate, and confirm. Go to this, for more about how the illusions happen - Greydon Moore (http://www.visitastronomy.com/3d-optic.htm) Showing a series which generates Fibonnaci numbers in the golden spiral in an absolute manner such irradicates noise at the source. Go to this for new fibonnaci's in golden harmonics: (http://www.visitastronomy.com/golden.txt) HARMONIC UNIVERSES A description of how to re-generate stereophonic sound in mono recording from single sound source reproducers (single channel) by re-tuning the whole environment into resonance patterns based on 6 and 12 sided hexagram geometry patterns throughout the environment, plus 5 sided pentagram geometry at long distances, also used to model 5th and 6th dimensional Reality states in Eternal Cosmic existence for all beings including Archangels and you. Go here for chronology of experiments and tests that failed and worked leading to full stereoscopic reproduction in a 100% mono sound source, which was, originally, stereo before recording. (http://www.visitastronomy.com/newsonic.htm) THE POWER OF SPACE IN A SEEMING EMPTY VACUME A totally different eclipse picture for the solar system in which the 4 inner planets, plus Jupiter and Saturn, are involved. The perfect eclipse states extend even outward to include Jupiter and Saturn in perfect eclipse states in place in solar space. Go here for perfect eclipse details and balanced equations of a new more fundamental kind involving perfect eclipse states. (http://www.visitastronomy.com/perfect.txt) (http://www.visitastronomy.com/perfect.htm) THE STEADY STATE HYDROGEN ATOM - EQUATIONS DEMONSTRATING WHY IT'S CONSTANTS CAN ONLY BE THOSE ONSTANTS The velocity of the electron in rest state orbit in the Hydrogen Atom provides enough 'velocity' drive to cause relativistic changes upon itself. Though extremely small in external world terms, internally within the atom these changes are exactly enough to account for the electron's own binding energy. From that we also learn at once that the atom's Borh orbit can have only one value, the value it currently has, and that the Pion partical is a direct consequence of shifts in magnetudes through all parts of the atom. Go to this for equations demonstrating why the fundamental constants in atoms are steady state: (http://www.visitastronomy.com/atom.txt) The first ever description of the atom showing why it has to occur the way it does, with nucleus, electron shell, and photon binding energies. This answers long standing mystry questions as to why electrons have their particular weight and size, why their least orbit is precise, why Pions and Upsilon mesons exist, and so on. There is a sole answer, certain virtues in special relativity theory make it impossible for the fundamental terms to have any other values. GREATSTAR'S EYETALK - uniphysics for a greater understanding of mass and matter in the universe. SMOKE IN A WIND TUNNEL - BACKGROUND BANG RADIATION IN THE UNIVERSE Missing mass, dark matter, physical matter mass, what is the difference between these three and water vapor, atmosphere, and smoke in a wind tunnel. There is no difference because they are synonomously identical. The smoke can be studied in experimental ease without knowing anything of what the atmosphere actually is, or the water vapor. Read on Why do current cosmological models seemingly correctly accomodate a 30 percent total in a missing mass the kind of mass missing unknown, and a 65 percent content in dark matter the kind of dark matter currently unknown - only the 5 percent remaining, known as planets, stars, and galaxies is known in evolved understandings based on constant long term observations. Picture in a role model laboratory scientists busy at work analyzing smoke whirling through a wind tunnel their particular discrete interest concered with the first few fragments of time when the smoke first entered the wind tunnel and suddenly starting to form in its long lasting visible patterns hurtling by. One thing about these scientists is they certainly are not from earth because they know nothing of earth's atmosphere made of atomic gases (21 percent oxygen, 79 percent nitrogen, and a fraction of a percent comprising other gases). They also know not of water vapor (molecular combination) in the flow in the wind tunnel, the unnamed different substance (earth calls water vapor) clearly a different substance with different behavior and behavior causing properties than the unnamed mysterious atmosphere content in the wind tunnel flow stream. The mysterous stuff earth calls water is observed to comprise 30 percent of the wind flow. The other mysterious substance (which earth calls earth's atmosphere) comprises 65 percent of the flow in the wind tunnel. The smoke under investigation comprises the remaining 5 percent in the wind tunnel's flow. The stupid aliens can easily and clearly study the smoke's attributes and behaviours without the impediment of knowing anything about the water vapor and atmosphere except to observe how each independently effects the smoke. Say, for instance, the aliens have happened to hit on a time frame in perfect accord with existence, that is to say, that the time for onset of initial smoke into the first forms of wind flow transformation is about proportionately on par with the first 400,000 years of the theoretical exploding universe after the big bang. See why these offworld scientists can explore and analyse the smoke, being aware of dark matter (molecular water vapor) without knowing exactly what it actually is, and the same for the missing mass (atomic atmosphere). One certainty before the scientists peering into the wind tunnel, is here the molecules of smoke are farther apart than they should be, due to mysterious dark matter (water vapor). Why do physicists scratch their heads in puzzlement as to why their best theories work when the most percentile high aspects of their theory constructions are simply unknown, except for the percentiles per se which are out there intermingling with the very small quantities of visible matter. (The above is a comment, no further references by GM). - GM Dec/2002 GREATSTAR'S EYETALK - uniphysics for a greater understanding of life and energy principles of the neutrino. A neutrino consists of two states of action, a temporary mass state, and a temporary energy state. The two states occilate back and forth sharing one occilation's time pak equally. In energy state, the neutrino is free to hurtle along unempeded at the speed of light and no mass is evident. In a flip suddenly the mass state is condensed into existence. Mass has a particular quality of being directly engaged with the speed of light. The speed of light is not a unique constant created by light. The speed of light is said to be the speed at which gravity particles (some call gravitons) emit through the vacumn to each other transferring each other's gravities the amount of gravity of each represented in the amount of carrier particles each is emitting to the other. Charge speeds at light velocity, it is said, and so do neutrinos, showing that since neither speeder (gravity, charge, neutrino) use the same exact velocity mechanisms as used by photons it is obvious that each 'light' speed is a different velocity all having the same measured pace through time. In relativistic entanglement, mass needs more of itself to access speeds sniffing the windspeeds of light, the closer to light speed the more the mass relativistically generated. A pak needs infinite mass to travel exactly at the speed of light where 0 equals 0. So, we know massing neutrinos will never reach light speed. However, when flipped to a mass state the state need only last time enough for relativistic tensions to start to burden before transformations in the neutrino actually start to happen. Flip, the built up tensions themselves cause the mass to flip back to energy which re-absorbs back into a single unit of existence comprising the neutrino. However, the neutrino is already custom built to have inside only the amount of matterial needed for it to survive, soon enough, as the energy neutrino with 'binding energy' inside speeds along at the speed of light, the extra incompatable tension created by relativistic tides in the neutrino eject the binding energy back out, the eject has enough power of force in it to kick the neutrino in resonance harmonics sustained at the speed of light (more pressure insinuating faster than light travel - less pressure insinuating a drag against perfect light speed, the two insinuations add up to a single cancel right in the middle, where the neutrino journies along half the time a tiny unit of mass hardly measurable, (sometimes occilated into something much more massive), and half the time a state of energy. It is possible a neutrino in mass state projects a virtual image of itself ahead of itself if the neutrino is mass dragging at a velocity under the speed of light threshold, the emitted neutrino arriving far enough ahead in the travel path that if distance and time factors were balanced the virtual neutrino travelled faster than the speed of light to get there. However this is no problem. The projected neutrino starts out travelling at light speed but instant startup relativistics start influencing its rest state mass quanity causing it to start to slow down. At the instant it slows close enough it becomes interactive with the original neutrino long distance (for instance the distance at which the electroweak elementary forces work, or more likely a much shorter distance unspecified herein), but since, as it happens, the projected neutrino is still ahead of the original in time at a faster than light traveltime, ahead by +1 units of traveltime, the original neutrino still trails at -1 units of traveltime. At the moment the two neutrinos reassemble into one entity both source entities contributing their + and - velocities, the net result velocitizes at the speed of light, and the whole occilating process immediately starts over again. The fact that mass can have existence during a tension phase that is different than rest state, means that infinite mass does not have to be instantaneous in arrival, a mass generating tensions at the speed of light has time to exist and the tensions to achieve a certain value in power before a change taking place to put relativistic tension in proper place. For instance in the solar system, the extra mass gravititionally generated by the general relativity in the sun's own mass, is exactly equal to the combined mass of Venus less the mass of Mars. What is noticed instantly about this unique relativistic factor in the solar system, is that both planets exist outside, beyond the sun. It means the extra mass generated by the sun's own mass, is incompatible with the sun's own rest state mass where relativisitics are absent from gravity. This is not a real true lie statement. It means if the gravity relativistic effects of the sun's own gravity is switched off, the instant collapse by a slight quantity of mass weight, and instant slight expansion of the sun's radius, transform into two rest state parameters for the sun. I think, somewhere in the above, is a correct description of the neutrino actuals. What is fact is that the neutrino occilates in time between a mass state, and energy state. You could say the neutrino becomes like binding energy - the neutrino becomes like mass - endlessly. No one is saying if the occilation rates between states varies or is constant throughout time. Two ways to go with that: each neutrino's rate varies as it hurtles along by the second, and all neutrino rates vary in same quantities as they all sail through the universe in every directions possible. See (http://visitastronomy.com/relative.htm) - interface between special and general relativity See (http://visitastronomy.com/infinity.htm) ELEMENTARY PARTICLE MASSES GENERATED IN COMBINED PARTICLE WAVELENGTHS ELEMENTARY PARTICLE HYPERWAVE HARMONICS A completely re-defined wavelength harmonics principle for sub-atomic particles in which mass energy states for the particles result from wavelength harmonics in fundamental physics as a natural inter-resonant occurrence. Go here for particle masses generated by hyperwave estates. (http://www.visitastronomy.com/hyperwav.htm) Go here for particle family masses in a collective symmetry structure which correctly predicts all charge states and masses in the Xion particle family tree. (http://www.visitastronomy.com/metaphor.txt) This is revolutionary stuff as far as galactic sciences are concerned. How long it will take to put across or any of it accepted is anyone's guess, whole news tends to creep through the ether's of human time in very slow motion. There is a show'n tell illustrating 'hyperwave estates'. Planet distances and distances between, including cross Sun distances, are shown matched with Compton wavelengths which have exact correspondences to certain elementary particles, there are quite a few particles perfectly matched in the cosmic crossing reccurrancing span, a pure ratio of (10 to the power 27). For more about how hyperwaves happen visit: http://www.visitastronomy.com/hyperwav.htm TINY DOT MAY BE A HARD PLANET, INCLUDED IN TWO PARALLAX TIDAL TRIOS AT SIRIUS See (http://visitastronomy.com/planets2.htm#hardplanet) Go slow. Oh awesome is this ever good. Is that a small hard planet sitting there, in position (b3) in the tidal trio. Another trio with three ovals on a parallax clock hand focused to the star, and next two it are two more ovals in identical parallax axis, no third oval is seen. Go fast. A tiny dark dot is noticed, exactly where oval (b3) is supposed to be. Whatta whopper. This little beauty is sitting right where it is supposed to be to make a complete set of 3 tidal quarks of Baryon class halleluliahs, found in planetary class amazes in giant star auras. Fundamental analogy is easy for tidal trios, in that they comprise three objects (quarks) which are the engineering constructors of Baryon class particles which include the Proton and Neutron, plus higher energy stable (temporarily) and unstable (very short lived) decay particles. Two tidals in a tide-lock are analogous to two-quark composites which make up Mesons which glue energies together within Baryons. Mesons include the Pion particle and the Kaon. Hard planets are anything round, spin like a top, have poles and are gravitationally compact enough to stay in shape for a long time. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, are solar system examples of hard planets. Solid planets are of course rock hard, and filled with metal, such as Mars, Earth, Venus, and Mercury. The tiny dot seen in the above parallax tidal group at Sirius cannot be declared as either a hard, or a soft, planet at this present time until scaling factors have been worked out to reduce the dot to datas that are exact enough to contain the dot's radius. There are tidal trios at Betelgeuse which face each other on opposite sides of the clock, that is, a trio in (say) the two o'clock position is matched by a trio at the 8 o'clock position. See (http://visitastronomy.com/planets1.htm#hbetelgeuse) I suggest it might be worth the effort to monitor tidal trio motions with great zeal. A third configuration might be possible for them, which is in a mercedes array, that is, three tidal trios which orbit equidistant from each other around the circumpherence, separated by 120 degree angles. It is clear from viewing the tidal trio images linked in this page, that each member of a trio is separated by a gap from each other. This is consistent with declared fundamental physics that no two particles can occupy the same place at the same time, in analogy, no two tidal objects can occur together without merging. However, fundamental particles can occupy two separate yet identical states at the same time, for instance two electrons in the shell one with spin up, the other spin down. In the star system analogy, the two states are found on opposite sides of the star - like a second Earth hidden behind the Sun. In hyperwaves analogies, the radius of one wavelength is like an orbit, linked in a straight line to the radius of another orbit on the far side of the Sun, forming a third wavelength which has a correct fundamental partical value via the combination. It is possible that many mechanical properties of orbiting entities in star based systems will reveal mechanics already seen in fundamental physics high energy particle theories. The most revealing aspects of the analogies are that the particle classes Mev's and charge states are entirely correct within the booms of the solar system Cosmic uniphysics. See (http://visitastronomycom/schemat1.txt) Objects orbit giant stars in tidal locked trios which defy ordinary Newtonian gravitational mechanics. Such objects can be seen in abundance and are easily described in images and captions. An introduction to the vast new subject can be viewed online at (http://www.visitastronomy.com/planets2.htm) TIDAL-ORBIT SADDLES AT DENEBOLA Two saddles - long thin objects - lay on a tidal orbit vectored straight to the center of Denebola. These are seen in the Dss 2nd gen (blue) plate. Saddles in tidal locked orbits are shown at other stars as well, here: (http://visitastronomy.com/planets1.htm) These uniquely unusual objects are herein called 'saddles' because it is not easy to form any kind of mental picture as to what they actually are if seen closeup, nor, how they can form long lineal shapes, except, tidal forces in supposed mutually exclusive orbits which nonetheless are coherent and sustained, are assumed to be sculpting factors. Such objects are called 'saddles' in for no reason that needs to be continued. A name was needed when attempting to describe them at (http://visitastronomy.com/planets1.htm#disclosure) Betelgeuse and the name 'saddle' arrived at the same time in mind and stuck there. So, for the time being, saddles it is. Tidal-orbit objects came readily to mind in understanding that two or more objects in the same straight-line orbital vector cannot stay together as a group due to sheer in gravitational velocity/period differentials, except here, around giant stars, there are groups locked together in seeming defiance of gravitational orbiting differentials, ergo, they are, somehow, tidally locked. Three markers along a sweeping second hand is how they behave. How they behave is as if the markers are made of silly putty and transmute in shape as the second hand sweeps around a parent star. Obviously, I am evading producing equations that might try to explain this. The reason is simple, that at my age I am disinclined to go through any new learning curves trying to develope sets of equations that might explain tidally locked groups of objects orbiting giant stars. Besides, producing equations for me does not seem an audience make, witness the above cited references and witness me still not a reciever of so much as a single relevent email after 10 years of passing such equations around and pointing them out to onliners. Perhaps there may be insights available to someone who reads gravitational differential principles that operate as one unified gear principle throughout our whole solar system. These are described in equations done when I was a young bucky of age 50: (http://visitastronomy.com/coupling.txt) Other saddles seen in orbits around stars are typically in groups of three saddles per tidal locked orbital position. See different links at the top of the (http://visitastronomy.com/Planets1.htm page for insights on what is calling 'tidal trios'. Some donor support or sponsorship would be appreciated. The visitastronomy.com site has been constructed, and is being supported, by minimal income earnings which forces severe restrictions to normal lifestyle, further, internet costs for such a giant site are high relative to normal internet charges. Therefore any support is welcome. A millionair astronomy enthusiast who appreciates the work which has gone into preparing a site such as my effort and making its contents available to anyone, should not feel being rudely approached or foolish if delivering a support. Creative works in previous centuries up to the early part of the 20th were always by patron and donor support and some of the greatest achievements in the sciences of physics, inventions, and the arts, was achieved only by free will friendly support of the creative efforts of individuals. A return to olden systems of support and appreciation would be terrific though not expected. It was a system which operated without endowment foundations and applications for grants which is almost meaningless for a project such as mine which does not see recieving support for funds which will otherwise go to extablished professional projects handled by highly educated specialists in advanced classes of research or unusual secular visions. My position is radically different, entirely self taught, and in it for a short term not long term, for instance the entire project has taken six years to learn then complete, not quite the time needed for a certificate of Phd in a reputed university environment. As you will, sponsorship or donation of funds specified for expenses is welcome, really welcome, no strings attached. A splash of income for relieving restrictions against a normal lifestyle would also help, in alternative. GM. ============================== There is a way of percieving gravity in company with the 3 other forces of the Grand Unification Scheme. The 'way' is so off the wall it may cause known professional thinkers to sob in despair that such a bizarro person (me) could have such a dolt-locked idea (myself). Nevertheless, the idea seems almost too perfect to be true. Almost, is the key word. The equations work, almost perfectly. Here is how. Compton wavelengths of elementary particles (-cms) are disassociate from mass energy states (Mev's) due to the simple fact of mathematical reciprocals; a lineal sum sequence (for instance Mev's which are 1+1+1), do not reciprocate to any lineal sum order instead become ratios but not even (1x1x1). To factor wavelengths (-cms) in any coherent way is not practical. It can be done, but just a few steps into the factoring can already produce one or two pages of tricky equations whose factors seemingly expand exponentially (or worse) with each added step, whereas lineal sum equations plow straight ahead uninterupted without hesitation, for instance (1+2+3=6). It can't get simpler. Physicists love this simplicity, except for the fact that it (lineal sums) cannot be used to predict elementary particle masses (Mev's). Re-combinants of Mev's and Compton wavelengths (-cms) can be easily coaxed into lineal sum coherent organizations in which elementary particle Mev's, and their (-cm) wavelengths, can have no other values. In other words the coherency is so precise the resulting Mev's, and (-cm) wavelengths, can be concidered constants, and so, therefore, totally predicted. Here is where the sobbing starts. The models used to comply this gene-splicing (re-combinant) picture is taken straight from the solar system, not just from planet orbital radii such as the orbit radii of Earth, and Saturn, but distances also between planets, for instance between Earth and Venus. Saturn and one of its moons (Phoebe) is a significant distance. Notwithstanding the racking sobs eminating along with guffaws from behind desks piled high with GUTS physics papers, (Grand Unification Theory Schemes), our solar planetary model has been successful in helping consolidate certain ideas and certain datas, to extreme high accuracy, for instance to the 5th and 6th significant digits for particle Mev's, and to 7 significant digits for the Neutron-Proton mass energy difference (1.294802 Mev). The solar planetary model inuendoed above has everything whatever to do with the Bohr solar model of the atom, this new 'solar tabletop model' goes straight into elementary particle cascades and decays per se, well inside atomic structures. The solar tabletop (model) differs in another aspect in that no motions are required to use it. Only differences separating distances are pre-requisite. The idea of bodies orbiting around others at velocity has no meaning, even though we would intrinsically know that the Moon moves around Earth at a velocity, and the Earth moves around the Sun. All we need to know for the solar tabletop model is the straight line distance to the Moon, and straight line distance to the Sun, as but two of many intrinsic space defining distances. What is most uniquely different is the solar tabletop model can be said to equal elementary particle Compton wavelengths on a one to one basis, that is, one (solar distance) equals the other (elementary particle Compton wavelength) to the known accuracy of significant digits for both the solar measures (10 to the +12 to +14 cms) and particle Compton wavelengths (10 to the -13 to -15 cms). The difference between the two states, fundamental (particles) and cosmic (solar obit differences) is simply 10 to the power 27. Multiply a given Compton wavelength by (10 to the power 27) and there will be a solar orbit. Divide a particular solar distance by the reciprocal of the same ratio and there will be a fundamental particle Compton Wavelength. The power ratio (10 to the power 27) is also the magnitude in contraction in which the wavelength of a photon bound in the rest state of a hydrogen atom, and the whole atom itself, is shrunk to plank's length to 10 to the power -33 cms) in order for the mass of the atom to start manifesting a feelable gravity presence. The solar tabletop model is not essential to percieving gene-splicing of Mev's and wavelengths (-cms) to arrive straight to other particle Mev's, and other particle wavelengths (-cms). The solar tabletop model helps to see pictures which make sense amongst what are otherwise simply datas streamed in digits and systems of units across a page of a notebook in a willy nilly pattern of stacked datas and tables. The solar tabletop model includes pictures which help the intuition take hold of the tables and stacked datas, stretching heartless datafacts out into images that talk very loudly. If racking sobs become disconsulate, or become borderline on sage, the solar tabletop model can be abandoned completely and the generic gene-splicing re-combinants lead to exactly the same consequences anyway, which can be called (of course) the particle wave model of particle mass/wavelength interactions, ie, exact calculations and predictions of certain elementary particle's mass energies (Mev's) are correct anyway, so nothing is lost, except a visually self evident model if 'tabletop' concepts are abandoned. Note that I have been citing Mev's not Gev's (the current standard). This is because equations can be set up using Mev's and (-cms) converted back and forth straight through a modified term of Plank's constant (h^) in which the floating decimals in the conversions working back and forth from Mev to (-cms) and visa versa always lands correctly, and this simplistic ease is not possible with Gev's due to what results as large before-decimal in one state (mass energies), and large after-decimal values preceeded with many 0's in conversion to the other state (waves), and visa versa. Mass energies (Mev's) are also used in lieu of masses per se, in that conversion from mass to wavelength is not direct through a single conversion factor using Planks Constant, at least not in a way that is in accord with most standard particle mass tables, which cite masses in Mev and Gev terms (reflecting the energy of the mass rather than rest masses (-grms) themselves. The modified Planks Constant term h^ used to achieve quick simple and easy balancing of all terms, is: (h/2pi) (x c) = 1973.2705332 mev -14cms) = h^ which interprets thus: Planks constant divided by two pi, times the speed of light, = h^ where h^ is a convenient symbol used to denote this critical (mev to -cm) conversion factor. Plank's Constant value of (6.5821220 x 10 -22MeV s) divided by 2 pi, speed of light times (2.99792458 x 10 to power 10 cm s-1) equals (1.9732705332 MeV -11cm) times 1000 equals (1973.2705332 MeV -14cm) equals h^ = converter For the h^ conversion constant, the above datas used were taken from Physical Constants data tables published in the '1994 Particle Data Reviews' via the Particle Data Group out of Berkley Cal. USA. ABOUT THE DISPLAY (http://visitastronomy.com/appendix.exe) Module APPENDIX.EXE is a small stand alone program which does nothing else but load a sequence of screen displays accessed by pressing different keys, and also scrolled by PG DN and PG UP. The module is a compliled batch file, so as to stand alone with keypress functions. Upon loading it may appear small in center screen so use your mouse to expand it to full screen size. ESC exits. Upon exit a blue hard to read endpage appears. Use the mouse on the standard little exit box. A Dos warner may appear as to 'application'. Just click this away and you are out. The module is harmless it cannot interferre with any of your computer's operations, since it is merely a batch fine presenting pages of displays coded with colors. The module APPENDIX.EXE is from an earlier scheme no longer in use. Therefore avoid pressing H for HELP since this will bounce you out because the file under pressletter H is not there. The name R.S Livingstone seen upon exit of APPENDIX.EXE is a former non de plume. The APPENDIX.EXE was written and compiled as a stand alone .EXE file by me (Greydon Moore) in 1994. A text file version with more cross harmonic space/wavelengths is read at: ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/anomaly.htm#arrow) Space anomalies - huge changes in normal galactic points of view .... tympanis, arrow, dark hole silent galaxy .... arrow in deep space, and a dark hole near a galaxy's ,,,, arrow ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/symmtry.htm) Fundamental symmetry aspects in pole polarities and superforms in galaxies and nebula .... Mobeus strip, and criss-cross symmetry principles in properties of Hubble 5 butterfly nebula, and Egg Nebula .... 4-way Andromeda galaxy pole polarity ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/blare.htm) Galaxy motions can be inferred by strong clues in images .... blaring in deep space how gravity waves perform and how they obey principles of radio frequencies and amplifications ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/hexagram.htm) Hexagrams occur in thermodynamic fundamentals in cosmic places .... Hexagrams riddle Crab Nebula ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/tympani.htm) Physical geometries found in astronomy ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/tympani2.htm) Tympani resonators in 30 Doradus and elsewhere .... Four-way axis pole polarity designes Tarantula Nebula in LMC ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/smoke.htm) .... Tympani resonators in an atomic bomb explosion .... Thermodyniac similarities between galaxy arms, volcano plumes, fires, atomic explosions, and galaxies ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/triangul.htm) .... Triangulum - collapsed galaxy is compacted as it moves along sideways ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/bigmass.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/m101.htm) .... Missing mass situation at Andromeda .... and at M101 ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/missmass.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/missmas1.htm) .... Missing mass is everywhere ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/arms.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/other.htm) .... Galaxies with 'long' antennae hold in present, .... signature of past collision events ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/bridge.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/core-m31.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/doodads.htm) .... Andromeda re-visited .... A bridge too far - M110 elliptical .... Andromeda's s-shaped core compares with s-shapes in other galaxies .... Doodads festoon the andromeda rim ----------- (http://visitastronomy.com/infinity.htm) .... Entropy seeking an ending to chaos RELATIVITY PRINCIPLES AND SPECTRUMS AS PLAIN AS DAY And finally, did you know that relativity e=mc(squared) has a physical picture, it is a pure and plain fact in simple geometry. (http://visitastronomy.com/hotbox.htm) UNIFYING THE ENERGY PRINCIPLES (http://visitastronomy.com/blare.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/dynamics.txt) (http://visitastronomy.com/impact.txt) (http://visitastronomy.com/appendix.txt) (http://visitastronomy.com/abstract.txt) Impact vibrations in principle have a look and feel which seems to have a hand in everything from subatomic particles to galaxies and galaxy superclusters. All carrier forces from the Strong, Weak, Gravity, and Electromagnetic, seem to co-operate in making the propigations and steady states work using aids such as Relativity and lineal sum combinations, with ratios transforming magnitudes in between the states and statuses comprising the foundations The notion of a counterswing clockwise rotation as interpreted by reading the moire doppler shifts is as real as it gets. The gravitic doppler properties at Andromeda are elsewhere collaborated by careful motion studies using small frequency shifts in Andromeda's electromagnetic spectum via telescopes over a long period of time to determine an identical motion, as seen in electromagnetism. The same doppler motions are seen in gravity waves at Andromeda except, the gravity waves are standing right out in the open magnified at cosmic proportions whereas the electromagnetic doppler frequency shifts designating motions are housed at atomic levels effected in ever atom and molecule radiating electromagnetic light from Andromeda. Two entirely separate states of fundamental physics produce two entirely identical results Original Andromeda images used in this presentation are found here and here Original M101 image used in this presentation is found here (http://visitastronomy.com/bullseye.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/m101.htm) Ad on TV shows cop in run awkwardly and voice over telling how Metamucil helped with the problem of constipation. So, here we have it, constipated cops, with Metamucil recommended to relieve stiff undignified slow motion movements MARS CATASTROPHE - for MARS.HTM Everything about Mars suggests a slow moving large object slammed a hole into what is now the North pole, causing a matter slew originating at the pole to spill down in a major basin on a large portion of the upper hemisphere, shock waves in occilating ripples moving forth to concentrate around the midrift causing the Mars 'Grand Canyon' as a major rupture opening up around a substantial growth of the equator in seismetically catastrophic strengths (almost split the planet in half you might think). I do not know what the exact Mars elevations are, but keep hearing persistent reports that canyon walls can be 100 miles deep. It makes me believe that atmosphere could be so thick down in the Mars canyons and deeper crevaces that it could be as thick as viscous soupy acid rains. Whether the Grand Canyon was ever liquid filled is a moot point, the fact of interest is what caused such a canyon in the first place. All galaxies have vortex, that is, their arms are not flattened against space in pinwheels that spin like paper doiles and ever so inexporably morph in an extreme slow motion oily manner sleazing around their surface on the flat tabletop of space. Not a chance, galaxies are THICK, and have voracious arms which snake and curl, writh and coil, kink and double back and forward though all dimensions of space around the galaxy, although there is a preferential in spreading out around the core. All cores are 'cammed' that is, rotated at an angle relative to the main plane of the galaxy as a whole. It is similare to orbital inclination of planets around the sun. Some galaxies have more than one different angle working together to comprise the 'cam' of a galaxy's core. The cam can be so extreme as to make the core look like a fish eye rotated in an extreme angle, otherwise the cams are more like buttons turned slightly. No galaxy seen so far in Virtual 3D is without 'cam' to one degree or another. Visit: (http://visitastronomy.com/cores.htm) NGC 5236 (http://visitastronomy.com/ngc5236.htm) The original. Very little can be seen. It is a funny looking spiral galaxy that is all. In Virtual Stereo 3D and enhancements made on the original image for 3D viewing a number of new things leap to sight. There is an enormous amount of missing mass, not seen in the original, now in plain view around the galaxy. A tremendous fluke thrusting into the foreground of space says that energies of previous unheard of kind are re-shaping galaxies on the go all the time in a blink of an eye in Cosmic Time. The center core is a bar stepped like Niagra Falls. It is a long rotating shaft with matter spewing up on the right hand side in great upsweeps and curling tightly down in sinues and coils on the left. In the middle where the super powerful core kernal peaks through, the further end is up, the nearer end down, in a vertical drop through the inner core's vertical alignment to the bar as a whole. See also super bar galaxy Ngc 1365 for a Niagra Falls at its center. (http://visitastronomy.com/1365.htm) All galaxies have this feature. That the cores are 'bars', of different elongated lengths, and a 'bi-lateral' symmetry (one side swirling up the other curling down) is found in all cores so far seen in Virtual 3D. And many cores can be clearly seen to have a drop step at middle central. See also bar galaxy Ngc 2442 for a Niagra Falls at its center. (http://visitastronomy.com/momentums.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/motions.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/motors.htm) An s-shape in the nuclear core region seems to be characeristic of any galaxy which has formed arms that spiral to one degree or another. There can be only two arms (usually many more) and in every instance the s-shape is there at the core. By 'powering down' images, taking a cutout of the core and magnifying it, and turning down the brightness of the image, a kernal core can be revealed in an image in which the very center of the core area is nothing but a screetch whiteout, and in all instances successful, a prominant s-shape is revealed. The s-shape is that at one end, matter sweeps up in a thick brush, at the other end it sweeps down usually in an equally thick broom-tail effect, sweeps initiating at close or at the core beginning as extreme thin ropes of inflowing, and outflowing, matters being churned and rapidly recycled by the core and whole galaxy dynamics. Virtual 3D stereo gives us a chance to study the actual motions of some galaxies through space (not all). The motion path of Ngc 1365 can be easily inferred, and the incoming of the rogue small satellite tethered to the Whirlpool Galaxy m51 can be understood at once without question, the moment it is seen in Virtual Stereo. Once seen in 3D the incoming motion can easily thereafter be understood even in ordinary single mono images. (http://visitastronomy.com/m51.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/m51boris.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/1365.htm) 1 - TO SEE WHAT THIS HECK THIS IMAGE REPRESENTED 2 - TO SEE WHAT THE OVERALL SIZE AND TOPOLOGY IS LIKE, AND TO SEE IF THE CORE IS S-SHAPED Look what came out of this nameless shameless contribution on the Internet. Meanwhile here is another of the same galaxy Ngc 6946 this one with some tetesterone inbuilt. An original is next. Enhanced in a few minutes with Paint Shop Pro resulted in the image that next follows, showing a galaxy rife with vortex. STROBE EFFECT Subtely different degrees of stereo help reveal more salient features for, instance this galaxy is thick, a lot of mass is indicated underneath. And an arm arcs up over the core in the upper center. The different degrees in stereo act as a form of 'strobe' revealing instant differences between A and B. Run the above three images again and notice things. The second image has been deliberately flattened to highlight the greater degrees of stereo in the 1st and 3rd images. (http://visitastronomy.com/rattles.htm) (http://visitastronomy.com/cores.htm) DONE IMAGE COMPARISONS This below is another galaxy with an s-shaped core. Ooops In the offchance the blue image was saved with the wrong sizing by someone, a closer comparison rotating the alignment a little more to compare the cores produces striking similarity, however the slope of the arms are not the same at all. The two are different galaxies with a similar core area dynamics The two seemed so similar as to be the same galaxy but they're not, the blue image is squashed like a pumpkin. Exaggerating its height reveals the dissimilarity in a more evident way. BY THE WAY This may seem like a poor choice to show this galaxy in full size but after 8 months surfing the internet the above rag is the only full sized usable picture spotted. Another was cropped at either edge and though 630 x 442 in size had a center area totally whited out nothing could be see. Even so, the arms of this much smaller rag (128 x 128) were sharper. Its name is not known for inclusion here. LAST WORD IN EDGEWISE And furthermore using very poor quality images for the above investigation may seem counter intuitive however it is usually the poor quality images that take the most time ferreting out a secret or solving one of its mysteries, for instance the above blue image had a core so similar looking in first impression to the black and white that a copy of the black and white was dug up for comparison, the black and white already in use elsewhere in comparison of cores. AND THE BONUS IS...... This from a set of similar style images (purple and blue without large foreground stars filtered out) that were making the rounds in magazines early in the 1990's. Kicked uphill by a jolt from the PC computer owner's deft touch it looks like this. First the rag. Then the rag rinsed with Bonus. RIBS AND TENDRILS IN M100 Tendrils including small tongs dig into M100 from a large gob which anomalously dominates the upper end of the s-shaped core. Notice that the right arm bridges under another arm before winding down the right flank, the fact of the underbridge means this arm initiated from the other side of the core and has been able to remain intact as a flow of angular momentum in passing below another angular momentum flow passing over head at right angles. It is not a mere phenomena of degrees of heat driving the two right angle motions. The juice that drives is angular momentum powered through vector changes by fields of gravity (and assume magnetism plus massive charge fields). In sum total an inertia keeps arms together even when arms lace through each other like jet streams At once something is learned. Below the gob with tendrils is a 'V' breach where two arms abruptly interleave. In stereo the two arms are folded at a right angle (more or less, picture the fold down an open book). Immediately below is the right side inner arm which passes underneath the arm to disappear into depth in the left side. These images cannot say if the underbridging arm is flowing out and down the inside right, or flows the other way. The gob is partially cleaved by an image patching error seen in a thin rectangle of different image densities along straight line edges A run of images each noticably different in color tones. When combined as pairs by focusing with the eyes you see details otherwise unnoticed leap forth. If focusing is uncomfortable, a sequence of paired images still works to mix and match details easily, since strong features in one color tone image will be replaced by other strong features in another of the color tones. You can put your slide rules away. Let eyesight light the ways for you. M100 is Cosmic. M100 images in (http://visitastronomy.com/s-shape.htm) -done- greydie@look.com